You are here:

Conflicting theories for the origin of the Moon

Levels: 5-6
NoS achievement aims: Understanding about science icon. Understanding about science
Contextual strands: Planet Earth and beyond icon. Planet Earth and beyond
Topic: Space

Rationale

There are different views on the origin of the Moon. Investigation results can be interpreted in different ways which are sometimes conflicting. Critical thinking and matching evidence with theories are skills that are highly valued in science.

What you need

Copies of the information on four theories of the Moon’s formation, and 14 pieces of evidence that support or refute those theories.

Word icon. Four theories for the origin of the Moon and fourteen pieces of evidence (Word 53 KB)

Focus

Exploration

  1. As a class, discuss each theory of the Moon’s formation.
  2. In groups, assign a theory to each group.
  3. Get each group to choose the pieces of evidence that support or refute that theory. (This may require further research.)
  4. Have each group present their findings to the class, giving reasons for their decisions about whether each piece of evidence (or combinations of evidence):
    • supports their theory
    • refutes their theory
    • has an uncertain/irrelevant relationship to the theory.
  5. After all groups have presented their findings, discuss with the class the pieces of evidence that seem to support two or more theories.
  6. Get the students to decide which is most likely to be the leading theory for the formation of Earth’s Moon and why.

Reflection

Activity resources

Word icon. Four theories for the origin of the Moon and fourteen pieces of evidence (Word 53 KB)