Science Online navigation
-
- Science in the NZ Curriculum
- Science capabilities for citizenship
- Nature of science
- Teaching science
- Teaching resources
- Science at work in the world
- Newsletters
This resource illustrates how a discussion based on information given on the Moths and Butterfly New Zealand Trust website can provide opportunities for students to strengthen their capability to critique evidence in the context of science.
The Nature of Science strand
Aims | Achievement objectives relevant to this resource |
---|---|
Investigating in science Carry out science investigations using a variety of approaches: classifying and identifying, pattern seeking, exploring, investigating models, fair testing, making things, or developing systems. | L1 & 2: Extend their experiences and personal explanations of the natural world through exploration, play, asking questions and discussing simple models. L3 & 4: Ask questions, find evidence, explore simple models, and carry out appropriate investigations to develop simple explanations. |
Living World
Aims | Achievement objectives relevant to this resource |
---|---|
Ecology Understand how living things interact with each other and with the non-living environment. | L1 & 2: Recognise that living things are suited to their particular habitat. L3 & 4: Explain how living things are suited to their particular habitat and how they respond to environmental changes, both natural and human-induced. |
Students discuss how scientists support “citizen scientists” to gather robust data.
On its website, the Monarch Butterfly New Zealand Trust gives instructions for people wanting to participate in research involving “butterfly transects”.
Adapting the resource
After the students have read the information on the website about butterfly transects, hold a class discussion that focuses on the likely quality of data collected.
First check that students have understood what butterfly transects are and what information can be gained from them. [Butterfly transects involve people regularly walking set routes and noting the butterflies they see. Data provided in this way over time provides information about changes in butterfly populations.]
Ask students:
Citizen science projects are becoming more common as the Internet enables rapid communication, easy gathering of data and automated storage of the data for subsequent analysis by scientists. With the help of many volunteers, scientists can gather data to answer questions that they would not previously have been able to address. However, citizen science projects rely on careful adherence to the research protocols by everyone who takes part: this activity could help build a sense of why that is important, as well as alerting students to the possibility of taking part in such projects. Developing an appreciation of how evidence in science is generated supports students to become scientifically literate, i.e., to participate as critical, informed, and responsible citizens in a society in which science plays a significant role. (This is the purpose of science in NZC.)
Do you students realise that quality research is dependent on carefully collected data?
Do students recognise that large data sets are likely to be more reliable than small sets?
For suggestions about adapting tasks in ways that allow students to show progress in critiquing evidence see Progressions .
Other contexts for Citizen Science projects:
The Marine Metre Squared project is a citizen science initiative that provides the basis for another capability 3 resource (See Marine Metre Squared).
The Garden Bird Survey , carried out annually by Landcare Research, has quite detailed counting protocols. See the resource The Garden Bird Survey: Participants’ Stories for capability 4: Making sense of representations about science ideas.
The Citizen Science New Zealand Tui Project asks citizen scientists to collect data on tui behaviour over the summer. The data collection involves quite specific attention to the environment.
Key words
Web resource, butterflies, citizen science