Science Online navigation
-
- Science in the NZ Curriculum
- Science capabilities for citizenship
- Nature of science
- Teaching science
- Teaching resources
- Science at work in the world
- Newsletters
This resource illustrates how an Assessment Resource Banks item can be adapted to build students’ capabilities to engage with science in real-life situations.
The Nature of Science strand
Aim | Achievement objectives relevant to this resource |
---|---|
Participating and contributing Bring a scientific perspective to decisions and actions as appropriate. | L3 & 4: Explore various aspects of an issue and make decisions about possible actions. |
Living World
Aim | Achievement objectives relevant to this resource |
---|---|
Ecology Understand how living things interact with each other and the non-living environment. | L3 & 4: Explain how living things are suited to their particular habitat and how they respond to environmental changes, both natural and human-induced. |
Students develop their awareness of the range of consequences an action might have.
This Assessment Resource Banks item is about interpreting food chains and food webs. The existing resource provides an opportunity for students to strengthen their capability to make sense of representations about science ideas. It can be easily adapted though to foreground the idea that any particular action can have a range of consequences.
Adapting the resource
First, work through the existing activity as a class, checking that students can read and construct a food web. Now ask:
If the crabs all developed a disease and died what would be the consequences for the other species in the food web?
Encourage students to give as many responses as they can, supporting their ideas with reasons. Students should be encouraged to think about both short term and long term consequences. [For example, in the short term there may be lots more chiton (because there are no crabs to eat them). There might be fewer mussels (because seagulls don’t have anything else to eat). With more chiton and fewer mussels there might be more plant plankton and less seaweed. When the seaweed is eventually all eaten the chiton will die off because they will have nothing to eat and the shrimps will only be able to eat plant plankton, etc.]
Encourage students to use tentative language (might, may be, it depends, etc.) when they are suggesting consequences. This reinforces the idea that it is often difficult to predict in advance what the consequences might be.
Lead a discussion about the sorts of questions students would need answered to be surer of their predicted consequences. [What is the life span of a chiton? How quickly do they breed? How mobile are crabs (i.e., how long would it be before new ones came into the area)?]
Supporting students to become scientifically literate, i.e., to participate as critical, informed, and responsible citizens in a society in which science plays a significant role is the purpose of science in NZC.
Scientifically literate citizens need to understand that any action has a range of consequences. This should help alert them to the possibility of unintended environmental consequences when decisions are made.
Can students identify a range of possible consequences (both short term and long term) and give reasons for their answers?
Do they use tentative language when making predictions?
Are they willing to explore a range of possibilities?
For suggestions about adapting tasks in ways that allow students to show progress in engaging with science see Progressions .
The Science Learning Hub has several resources exploring food webs. There is also a related example in the science exemplars:
Key words
Assessment Resource Banks, environment